There was no #7 presentation in “The Future of the Church” series in the 2011 Lenten Noon Forum at St. John the Divine Anglican Church on Quadra in Victoria, B.C.
“The Future of Church #7″ is my reflections on what I gleaned from listening for six hours to a retired pastor and writer, a traveling spiritual teacher and writer, three active Anglican parish clergy, an academic historian and university administrator, an archbishop, and an ethicist and retreat/conference centre administrator talk about what they see in the future for the church.
I heard 12 main points in all this talk about the future of the church. These 12 themes were repeated in many of the talks:
1. The church is in the midst of a massive cultural sea change. This paradigm shift is altering everything around us and we in the church are not at fault for the devastating impact it is having upon our institution. The decline in the church is not primarily the fault of mismanagement, bad theology, or lack of good will. We are caught up in forces much bigger than we can control.
2. The shift we are currently navigating is generally described as a move away from rationalism, propositional faith, and institutionalism. People are no longer seeking intellectual answers to questions or rigid institutional embodiments of those answers. They are looking for a deep experience of God and profound inner wisdom to support them in living authentic and integrated lives. We can no longer assume institutional loyalty. The days when we could rely on loyalty to the church and general agreement to a uniform body of dogmas are gone. It is not adequate to demand allegiance, or simply keep announcing our convictions confident people will eventually sign up.
3. Although the institutional expression of faith is in precipitous decline throughout North America and Europe, faith is not in decline. The majority of people still believe in God and have deep spiritual longings. They simply would not think of looking to the church to satisfy their spiritual hunger.
4. Faced with decline, the institution of the church is permeated by fear. Some in the church are fearful for the preservation of their cherished institutions and buildings. Others fear that their familiar theological formulations are being threatened. Fear is never a good starting place for opening to the movement of God’s Spirit.
5. The pervasive fear in the church is paralyzing. It inhibits genuine conversation and keeps us fixated on finding solutions, rather than launching into bold new adventures of faith. There is no way to move forward until we come to grips with the reality of fear. Dealing with fear requires deep personal and corporate spiritual practice. Only transformed people will have the ability to be a transformed church.
6. The church will not recover its nerve, its creativity, or its authenticity simply by instituting fancy new gimmicks, implementing flashy programs, trying to get more organized, or working harder. The way forward is through the development of meaningful spiritual practices,a renewal of corporate spirituality, and a profound shift of consciousnss in the way we do church. These deep inner changes will only be achieved by creating space for an awareness of the presence and action of God to emerge in our midst.
7. People want to learn spiritual practices. They want wisdom for the journey of life. If the church is going to meet these real desires, we must put aside our obsession with the institution and explore the presence and action of God’s Spirit at work in our lives, in our churches, and beyond the church in unexpected places throughout the world. Where we find God’s Spirit at work, we must cooperate with and celebrate that work, even when it seems unusual and unsettling to our established ways of doing church.
8. In order for us to cooperate with the work of God’s Spirit, we must loosen our grip. If the church wants to move forward in the current environment, we can allow no place for stultifying rigid hierarchy or oppressive control. Clergy must learn to let go. We need to relax our structures, allow for fluidity, flexibility, openness, and diversity.
9. Letting go means being willing to accept that certain things may need to die. There are some institutional expressions of faith that are simply no longer sustainable. Certain things must be left undone in order to create space for new things to arise. For a time this may look messy. It may seem like failure. But the only failure is demanding that what has been in the past must continue to be in the future. Such a demand makes us unable to respond to the call of God’s Spirit blowing through the church today.
10. A church that has the potential to appeal beyond the narrow confines of churchland, will be driven by a vision that reduces division and emphasizes the oneness of all creation and of the human community. We are too familiar with the devastation of division in our midst. We know too well the impact of dissension and discord. The world is looking for places where the realities of deep connection are honoured and practiced. When churches quarrel and separate, they erect impenetrable obstacles to being able to speak in any meaningful way to the world beyond the church. We must model profound respect for all people. We must learn to pay careful attention to the world and to listen carefully for God’s Spirit at work in all peoples’ lives. Good speaking always starts from good listening.
11. We need to listen to the world outside the church and find ways to make church more accessible to that world. The world will never listen to an arrogant voice that pronounces from a position of power and privilege. The world will listen only to the authentic voice that speaks from a place of deep sensitivity and openness to the real wisdom that is already present in the hearts of people who do not find a place in the church.
12. There is hope. God has not given up on the church. God has not given up on the world. There will always be a need for spirituality to be embodied in some form of institutional expression. As we navigate the death throes of institutional forms that no longer have life and vitality, we need to keep our hearts open to the presence of the God who has not abandoned us. We need to trust God’s work in our midst and remain open to one another and to the world around us trusting in the faithful guidance of God’s Spirit.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 15, 2011 at 6:39 am
Kim
“The church will not recover its nerve, its creativity, or its authenticity simply by instituting fancy new gimmicks, implementing flashy programs, trying to get more organized, or working harder. The way forward is through the development of meaningful spiritual practices,a renewal of corporate spirituality, and a profound shift of consciousness in the way we do church. These deep inner changes will only be achieved by creating space for an awareness of the presence and action of God to emerge in our midst.”
One question and a comment; What is “corporate spirituality”? I have a little trouble grasping that term.
My comment is if I liken the downward path the Church is on right now to an escalator, the conversation seems logically to be how can we step off the one going down and on to the one going back up. This downward journey seems to be messy and about to get more so [fear]. Might it be that there needs to be a crash with the institution blown up at the bottom in order for something completely new and original to rise out of it?
Also, what I hear in the post is a need to replace seeking intellectual answers with seeking the spirit in our hearts. Almost like saying a heart focus instead of a brain focus. I suggest this will be a challenging change for us, as I believe opening our hearts is the most vulnerable state we can put ourselves in. I agree that it is the best path for sure, just that for me it is also the hardest to do on any kind of daily basis. Teachings and wisdom on what that means might be the new way forward. Authenticity will be required that looks like genuine vulnerability and humility. A tall order for us all.
April 15, 2011 at 7:57 pm
inaspaciousplace
“corporate spirituality” – the way we live our spiritual life together as a community, the values, principles, spirit we embody when we gather. Communities have an identity. Spiritual communities have a spiritual identity. So, how we conduct ourselves in communion with one another communicates something about who we are as a community of faith.
hope that helps.
April 15, 2011 at 8:44 am
ron cole
Beautifully said…grab your hammer and nail your thesis to the ” church ” door. Part of me wonders if we are not a day late and dollar short…if what is left in the institution can engage in such change.
April 15, 2011 at 9:43 am
ron cole
Just a question Christopher…I know your a local priest, and apart of the Diocese of British Columbia, a ” very ” institutional church. Will you grapple with the issues you raised here within the context of your own community? And , the bigger question…can you within the confines, the canon and law of the institution. The reason I ask, because in the late 1990′s I left the Anglican fold after being part of it most of my life. It was almost a crisis of faith, not that I was loosing it…it was becoming something the church couldn’t handle. The church seemed too challenged with an identity crisis…how does one engage in profound change with the constant fear of loosing some Anglican identity. It seems the fear, the desperate clenching of clinging to what it is to be Anglican might be the choke hold that kills it. The mystery of the parable, the kernel of wheat…deeply challenges our fear. It’s amazing that people of the resurrection fear death, that void, that liminal place, the Holy Saturday where death is experienced…but, no matter how much suffering, and pain…new life does emerge. I long for community that would engage in all 12 of the issues you raised…I see something deeply redemptive and beautiful arising from the struggle. Peace…Ron Cole+
April 15, 2011 at 7:12 pm
inaspaciousplace
thank you Ron for your lovely comment.
I am blessed to serve in an extremely supportive parish. I am surrounded by people who tend to think outside the box. In fact, sometimes I think they don’t even know there is a box.
I believe there are communities like the one in which I serve dotted all around the Anglican landscape.
The tragedy is that we have lost so much vitality, energy, and creativity because people like yourself, for good reason, have felt squeezed out and withdrawn their questions, challenges, and insights. We are the losers.
I hope you may run across a community some day that can embrace your search.
April 15, 2011 at 11:31 am
Chris Eve
Ron Cole wrote ” Will you (Christopher) grapple with the issues you raised here within the context of your own community?”
This question should be in the present tense! As part of that community for 14 years I think the answer to this question is clearly “yes”. In his writing and preaching I feel challenged regularly. But don’t take my word for it: there’s a selection of sermons here. http://www.stphilips.bc.ca/sermons.html
April 15, 2011 at 12:52 pm
ron cole
Thank you Chris for the link…I shall visit.