Historians have noticed that when Germans are asked about the uncomfortable issue of the Holocaust, many quickly bring up the war. ‘The Jewish war,’ as some Germans described it is remembered as a disaster for the German people as victims. The bombings stood out as the German civilian war experience. This is not the place to analyze how their self-image as victims might have alleviated German responsibility, embarrassment, or guilt regarding the genocide, nor how much serious damage was actually wrought. Kaplan, Marion A. Between Dignity and Despair: Jewish Life In Nazi Germany
I have reflected elsewhere on my own experiences as a child being introduced to the mysterious forbidden world of sexuality by predatory grown up men. (“Truth Telling” April 13, 2010) I might well be described as a “victim” of these adults who abused their position of privilege and power in my life. I have no doubt that I suffered a complex emotional wounding from these experiences in my pre-teen years.
But, as I think about those adult males in my past who took advantage of the positions entrusted to them, I have no doubt that they acted out of the wounds, brokenness and unresolved hurts of their own early experiences of childhood and youth. No doubt the same could be said for those who perpetrated monstrous violence against the Jews in Europe and presumably even Hitler himself.
The risk with self-designating as a victim is that I create an identity out of my victimhood and thus relieve myself of responsibility for the choices I make in my life. If I choose to identify myself as a victim there is a risk that I render myself powerless to do whatever small things in my life I might be capable of doing to improve my circumstances.
If the horror of Nazi death camps demonstrates anything, it surely shows that in the midst of the most inhumane conditions imaginable, it remains possible for human beings to choose nobility and humanity rather than sinking to the level of their abusers. Of course it is utterly naive and arrogant to assume I can predict how I would react under the terrible circumstances faced by those who suffered the atrocious violence of Nazi hatred.
But Viktor Frankl who survived internment in both Theresienstadt Ghetto and Auschwitz concentration camp has written that he discovered through his experience that, “it is possible to practice the art of living even in a concentration camp, although suffering is omnipresent.” (Man’s Search For Meaning, p. 64)
Given a chance, the human spirit is capable of transcending the most despicable dehumanizing experiences. There is no force on earth that can finally deprive us of the gift of our freedom to choose how we respond to the circumstances of our lives no matter how horrific they may be. Frankl writes,
Now we were treated like complete nonentities. (The consciousness of one’s inner value is anchored in higher, more spiritual things, and cannot be shaken by camp life. But how many free men, let alone prisoners, possess it?) 83
The experiences of camp life show that man does have a choice of action. There were enough examples, often of a heroic nature, which proved that apathy could be overcome, irritability suppressed. Man can preserve a vestige of spiritual freedom, of independence of mind, even in such terrible conditions of psychic and physical stress. 86
everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms – to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way. 86
The greatest power on earth is not the power of bombs and dictators. The greatest power on earth resides in the human ability of inner choice. No one can take from us our capacity to choose how we respond to whatever is occuring in our lives in the present or whatever may have happened to us in the past. We can choose to see ourselves as a wounded person held hostage by unresolved bitterness, pain, and grief, or we can choose to affirm the invincible radiant reality of God’s Spirit dwelling in the depths of our being. Frankl says,
in the final analysis it becomes clear that the sort of person the prisoner became was the result of an inner decision, and not the result of camp influences alone. Fundamentally, therefore, any man can, even under such circumstances, decide what shall become of him – mentally and spiritually. He may retain his human dignity even in a concentration camp. 87
In the end, the only real vicitm is the one who loses touch with the ability to choose. The victim is the one who falls prey to the illusion that external circumstances are more powerful than the human freedom to make a choice in response to even the most difficult realities. Victory goes to the one who affirms that, in the midst of darkness, I can turn to the light and that light fills my being with life.
9 comments
Comments feed for this article
August 26, 2010 at 12:50 pm
Jaqueline
What Christopher has to say about victimhood is universally helpful and insightful and necessary…
My comment however is about Ms Kaplan’s quote, but how would anyone know what to think of Kaplan’s assessment if an alternative voice is not provided?
I hope these better, more objective voices than mine might address the inaccuracy of her statement :
http://adamash.blogspot.com/2005/10/bookplanet-untold-german-suffering-in.html
“any public airing of ( German) grievances was subject to severe constraints and cold war manipulation. And when the German children born during or shortly after the war came of age in the heady years of the late 1960s, they demanded that Germany view the war through the lens of non-German victims, not that of its own losses. German victimhood became politically incorrect. ”
“In On the Natural History of Destruction….. Sebald turned to the Allies’ firebombing of German cities–and to the Bosch-like scenes of carnage, pain and trauma it inflicted on a largely civilian population. Why is it, he asked, that the horrendous experiences of millions of Germans left so little trace in postwar German literature (and, by extension, in the population at large)?”
“The same ( German ) people who insisted on the “singularity” of Nazi atrocities and rejected the very notion of historical comparison (for fear of relativizing the Holocaust and diminishing German responsibility) now speak of the “unparalleled” destruction of German cities and openly question the morality of the Anglo-American Bomber Command. ”
“To raise such questions doesn’t diminish the barbarism and inhumanity of the Holocaust. Nor does it cast doubt on the need to defeat Hitler. “
August 26, 2010 at 2:39 pm
inaspaciousplace
Jaqueline,
Thank you for this excellent link. I wish I could hear Marion Kaplan in discussion with Mark Anderson. His blog post gives rise to many thoughts, particularly:
1. War is probably insane and no one ever “wins”.
2. Everyone’s story must be told and everyone’s pain needs to be acknowledged.
3. In the end, it is not the presence, absence, or quantity of pain that is at issue. The important question is whether our pain breaks us open to a deeper humanity or keeps us frozen in death.
Blessings,
c.
August 27, 2010 at 8:49 pm
Rob H
Civilians and city’s were also bombed in England and Europe and Asia and their were many that experienced what is a called a Fire Storm where a fire starts and goes so hot that the air is sucked out of anything that is within its radius.
The link supplied was informative and I do not debate about stories not being told until year later but it also applied to all parties.,
Most people wanted to move on and forget their own personal experience, their form of healing, not good but for them a fact.
It is so easy to state one country should have not done this today but at the time the options were not many. Certainly the Allies were not asked if one should bomb London or Coventry on a continual basis proper or only the perceived military areas like the harbours or airfields.
Christopher’s above comments are the best we could do and acknowledge War is HELL, nobody wins and it should not have happened to anybody.
At this point we are not able to make ploughshares out of weapons but we can leave the safety on and work on living with each other.
That requires a lot of prayer and faith in ones God for today.
My thoughts
Blessings
August 28, 2010 at 1:07 am
Jaqueline
“Civilians and city’s were also bombed in England and Europe and Asia”
It is not quite the same : More people died in one night of bombing Dresden that died from bombing in England during the whole of the war. Dresden was one city: 67 Japanese cities ( not including Hiroshima and Nagasaki ) and 131 German cities were bombed in total.
“As an officer who served under LeMay, Lieutenant Colonel Robert McNamara was in charge of evaluating the effectiveness of American bombing missions. McNamara’s comment on the bombing was this:
LeMay said that “If we’d lost the war, we’d all have been prosecuted as war criminals.” “And I think he’s right,” says McNamara. “He, and I’d say I, were behaving as war criminals.” . . . “LeMay recognized that what he was doing would be thought immoral if his side has lost. But what makes it immoral if you lose and not immoral if you win?”
http://www.ditext.com/japan/napalm.html
August 28, 2010 at 10:31 am
Rob H
Hello Jaqueline,
You have to look at all the information and you discover that each side escalated based on whatever objectives were being wanted at the time.
It was Germany that did the Air Blitz against Poland, France, England with deliberate civilian attacks. Many cities were targeted in England, some by accident then by design.
In both cases Japan and Germany were not going to surrender and the leaders were certainly not listening to their citizens so the war was brought home to its major cites.
Was that the right thing to do , it was if the premise was to stop more killing of both sides. I’m not not into body counting , each life is precious but that is the result of HELL being unleashed.
In 1942 ……………..
” The Führer has ordered that the air war against England be given a more aggressive stamp. Accordingly, when targets are being selected, preference is to be given to those where attacks are likely to have the greatest possible effect on civilian life. Besides raids on ports and industry, terror attacks or retaliatory nature are to be carried out against towns other than London. Minelaying is to be scaled down in favour of these attacks.
—Signal from the Führer’s headquarters to the Luftwaffe High Command, 14 April 1942.[119][120]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II
Cheers
August 30, 2010 at 1:32 am
jaqueline
Hi Rob,
I hope I was not implying by that Hitler or Germany was guiltless in this whole enterprise?
Though it was shocking to me after hearing about the London Blitz all my life that the Allies themselves actually participated in attacking civilians on such a massive scale.
However the purpose of my comments was to address Marion Kaplan’s possible insinuation that Germans felt no actual guilt or responsibility or awareness of their sins because of the bombings and were feeling more sorry for themselves than they ought to.
.
August 30, 2010 at 7:43 am
Rob H
Jaqueline,
Good point in the way one could read her comments
I’m quite sure their were Germans who knew what was happening, some withdrawn into themselves to survive their own regime and others who were not aware of anything around them.
It was a whole mess and the bombings brought home what had been happening around them.
Having the Russians on your steps was probably a nightmare.
September 10, 2010 at 12:26 pm
jaqueline
May be it’s justice:
This is a rundown of casualties of WW2
USA 220 000 (all combattants) Australia 30 000 (all combattants) Belgium 60 000 (10 000 combattants) Britain 430 000 (370 000 combattants) Bulgaria 10 000 (all combattants) Estonia 140 000 (all civilians) Finland 90 000 (all combattants) France 520 000 (250 000 combattants) Greece 100 000 (20 000 combattants) Yugoslavia 1 600 000 (300 000 combattants) China 13 500 000 (3 500 000 combattants) Lithuania 120 000 (all civilians) Netherlands 135 000 (23 000 combattants) Norwegians 10 000 (all combattants) New Zeeland 10 000 (all combattants) Poland 2 620 000 (120 000 combattants) Romania 240 000 (200 000 combattants) USSR 18 600 000 (13 600 000 combattants) Czechoslovakia 90 000 (20 000 combattants) Hungary 200 000 (120 000 combattants) Austria 270 000 (230 000 combattants) Italy 400 000 (330 000 combattants) Japan 2 060 000 (1 700 000 combattants)
and Germany 6 890 000 (3 250 000 combatants)
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_were_the_human_costs_of_World_War_2_with_particular_attention_to_the_civilian_and_military_losses_in_Russia_Germany_Britain_United_States_China_and_Japan
September 10, 2010 at 12:46 pm
Rob H
Interesting Link,
The rest of the story in that link as to wounded, murdered, purges, et cetra and Canada is not included in its losses (42,042) nor its merchant MArine losses.
Quote: “Hello John,
It is usually stated that around 56 000 000 people died in the war (i.e. because of the war), of which around 25 000 000 were combattants.
This at least according to the “official” list published by the UN. It is of course impossible to get any precision in these figures.
Remember, these figures do not include the Holocaust, nor the Soviet purges or any other nationally domestic killing that took place during the war. It counts only people killed by other nations than their own.
In terms of nation list, there is a UN such as well. It lists only the dead, not wounded/maimed/missing. Numbers could not be had from all nations, and all nations used very approximate figures. Nations such as Finland; Norway and USA did lose civilians, as did others not listed at all (Denmark e.g.), and the Baltic countries lost combattants, but all either unknown or too few to list (less than 10 000 were not taken up on the list). So in terms of “human cost”, it tells perhaps half a truth. But here it is anyway;
Dead , see jaqueline’s clip above…
extract continues…
Hope that enlightens a bit. But as I said, for a total human cost you need to add a whole lot of people to these lists. Germany alone had over 7, 000 000 wounded, many of whom were scarred for life. The USA listed 670 000 WIA, the Brits 320 000 wounded (not all in action, as it includes civilians), France 400 000, the USSR 14 000 000 and so on.
Sincerely Tommy
End of quote: