(warning: This may sound like whining; that is not the intention. The intention is to describe some of the factors that make it difficult to do church in a 21st century western cultural context.)
Anyone who concerns themselves with the state of the Christian church in the western world is aware that for the most part it is an institution in decline. Fewer people attend church activities; finances are tight; volunteers are stretched; professional staff feel overwhelmed.
There are a number of factors in our culture that may contribute to the challenge of being church in our day.
1. People are seldom at a lose to find ways to spend their extracurricular time. We all already have far too many options when deciding how to use the few discretionary hours that work and family commitments leave at our disposal. The competition for peoples’ spare time is ferocious. If churches are determined to generate increased involvement in busy activities, they are always going to be swimming against a strong current of resistance.
2. The human need for a sense of connection is being met adequately without church. We in the church may feel that the work place is an inadequate substitute for true community, but for many people the connections they form at work are entirely adequate to satisfy their desire for community. Professional life has become so demanding that there is often little time left to develop alternate forms of community beyond the workplace.
We may mock the connections people feel they are making through social networking tools; but for the people involved they are real and satisfy a need. It is hard to compete with technology.
3. Technology has not given us more free time, but has increasingly consumes our time. According to a December 2009 Harris Interactive poll, 80 percent of U.S. adults have online access, whether at home, work, or elsewhere. Those who surf the Net spend an average of 13 hours per week online, up from 11 hours in 2007. We may decry the fact that people are spending a lot of time online, but it is a reality we must face.
4. Staying home is an increasingly attractive option. When the living room is filled with a 52 inch screen tv with surround sound stereo and the most recent movies can be downloaded for a fraction of the cost of going to a theatre or even renting a DVD, the incentive to go out is diminished. The days when churches were the centre of a community’s entertainment life are over.
5. The pace and clamour of daily life for most people are not conducive to the quieter, more gentle and inward focused disciplines that are traditional to the development of a deep spirituality. In a culture where people find it difficult to sit still to read a book, traditional Bible study, quiet prayer, and worship that is often passive for most participants, are unlikely to draw a crowd.
6. Society offers a tremendous variety of ways today to be socially engaged and active. Greenpeace, the Western Canada Wilderness Committee, the Sierra Club, the Compost Education Centre, Swan Lake Nature Sanctuary, the local Immigrant And Refugee Centre Society, the Hospice And Palliative Care Foundation, Raincoast Conservation Society, Islands Trust Fund, Family Caregivers’ Networksociety, the Land Conservancy, to name just a few, all offer fabulous opportunities for volunteer involvement and charitable giving.
The Compost Eduction Centre is a tiny organization near my home. It is dedicated to teaching the importance of garden compost. Last year 125 volunteers contributed over 1,700 hours to deliver the Compost Education Centre’s educational programming. Churches are operating in an enormously competitive market for the volunteer hours available in our community.
7. The competition is not just for time, but also, of course, for money. Living is expensive. Disposable income is at a minimum. The economic downturn has diminished levels of donations across the spectre of charitable organizations.
Churches that find it difficult to rely upon volunteer hours, find it equally difficult to raise adequate financial resources to pay the kind of salaries that are necessary to attract capable people to paid positions in the church.
8. There is no longer any social support for church involvement or Sunday worship attendance and often active opposition. Young families are torn between keeping their children in organized sports and participating in church services on Sunday morning. When the busyness of the work week has made it impossible to get the necessary family shopping done, Sunday morning store hours represent a blessing to the consumer, even if a curse to the church.
9. Our highly developed materially comfortable consumer oriented culture makes it less like that there will be a serious desire to explore the hidden realms of spiritual life than in a situation of greater deprivation. The Christian church is only growing in Africa, Asia, and Latin America, where economic challenges are a daily reality and where the connections of human community are more seriously valued.
10. Western culture is deeply individualistic. We resist significant connection with the people with whom we share living space. We are hesitant to get involved in other peoples’ lives and resist the burden of being too intimately connected.
11. Even those people in our society who do desire some form of organized spiritual activity, have a multitude of options from which to choose. You can go to the yoga studio, join Spirit Hikers, attend an endless variety of meditation workshops and retreats, or listen to your favourite spiritual teacher on a podcast. The list of spiritual options in any community is endless. Church is certainly no longer the only show in town when it comes to nourishing a spiritual life.
12. Churches are probably near the bottom of many peoples’ list when it comes to looking for spiritual nourishment. Churches continue to struggle under the burden of a bad reputation. Churches are seen as rigid, dogmatic, disrespectful, violent, disrespectful organizations interested only in preserving ancient outmoded traditions and abusing anyone who does not fall in line with the predominant thinking of the community.
13. Small and local are increasingly attractive options for many people. Certainly, where I live, there is a tendency to desire gather in more intimate local social groupings. People are drawn to the small neighbourhood pub and coffee shop. They want to be able to bike or walk to their destination. They are attracted to enterprises that are sustainable and environmentally friendly. Churches that depend upon attracting large gatherings in order to support large costly buildings are going to find it increasingly difficult to thrive.
14. Change is not popular in churches. It is difficult for churches to adapt to the rapid changes that are radically altering the context in which they must operate. Churches are often burdened with buildings, models of leadership and traditions that emerged from and were designed to address a culture that no longer exists.
There is a tendency, in the midst of all the flux and uncertainty of our culture, for church members to hunker down and determine that church will not change. It is tempting to try to make church into a fortress that resists the chaos and uncertainty characteristic of so much of our culture.
15. Churches have a tendency to view themselves as the bearers of the truth. We have not been good at listening to the world beyond our sacred walls. We have seen our job as telling those outside the church what we believe is good for them. In a culture that finds it difficult to respect authority and that questions everything, telling others how to live and what to believe does not work.
Many of these realities cannot be changed by the church. But we must take seriously the world in which we operate.
We must learn to listen to the culture in which we are attempting to foster spiritual community. We must look honestly at our own life asking what things we need to let go of in order to support the spiritual flourishing of people in our day.
16 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 27, 2011 at 8:20 am
Sarah B
I appreciated the post. Thought provoking, definitely. Kind of put to words many things that have been in my mind.
It made me smile too, because it was definitely written by someone living in Victoria. 🙂 For example, the clubs that people spend time in are definitely weighted to the West Coast more than a place like Edmonton. 🙂 🙂 And here, there is a little less collective need to get places by bicycle!
January 27, 2011 at 9:44 am
Rob
This post of yours definitely brings out the author in you as I can see the stickies on the wall marking the 15 stating points which would then await details.
Well done though I wonder of you took a list of items people in a church support in prayer, funds and work , how many would be duplicates.
The church used to be the communities main provider, supporter of those who needed help and the communities event organisers. In Canada we are a more social country and allowed secular governments to take over to help those in need.
A lot of non church groups have been created to fill the gaps of government.
As you say, how can we be part of the solution to make ones spiritual need known and to see that we can offer a place of knowledge and belief.
For our Edmonton friend we also have skates to travel with but ours do not need blades.
Ah.. I did tell a special person in the mall yesterday that Christopher’s blog is hard work at times for us who comment and this one was a hard read but well thought out.
Cheers
January 27, 2011 at 2:22 pm
Kim
Not a simple problem I see. All those points seem to be at play Christopher.
One aspect of life in my generation I have noticed in the last 30 years is the increase in two income families. If your business carry’s you to local residences you realize that no one is home. This factor alone has contributed to a loss of family time. Fewer dinners together equals less engagement among families. Everything that would have been done by a stay at home partner during the day is pushed into the nights and weekends. I believe this has come at great cost to us all. Ironically, this is where the calm reflective time that is church on sunday is most valuable. But we seem to have missed that. Little time seems to be the norm for the increasing part of our population that struggles financially. A single income is the domain of the comparably wealthy now. Time and choices they have in abundance.
I have always thought that our tax system could easily be changed to give a leg up for those young families who choose the harder road of a stay at home mom or dad. Wouldn’t this also support the institution of marriage?
I don’t think we yet know the full cost of a generation of latch key children or families with no time to look after each other or tend to their spiritual needs. I think the financial cost of the latter will far exceed the lack of government support early on.
Mmmm, wonder how I got from doing church to way over here? 🙂
January 28, 2011 at 6:07 am
inaspaciousplace
This is tremendously important.
When I started out in the clergy business, the Rectors in Anglican Churches would almost all spend their afternoons going around visiting in the homes of their parishioners. It has taken a long time to catch up with the fact that, as you say Kim, now no one is home. This is a massive shift in our culture. It signifies a change in the way we do everything as a society.
It intrigues me no end, and actually quite thrills me, that some of the best conversations I have had with people in the past eight months have taken place at 6:00 in the morning as I sit in my study drinking my herbal tea and typing on my little Eee PC Notebook. I wonder if the day is coming when such an exercise might actually be considered a valid part of ministry.
January 28, 2011 at 7:02 am
Bruce Bryant-Scott
Well, does reading the blogs of colleagues at 7:00 am while drinking coffee count as a valid part of ministry? I sure hope so!
January 28, 2011 at 10:05 am
jaqueline
Do we realise how much no-one being at home has actually changed the sense of connection we have with each other? Do we realise what an essential role women have had keeping our society connected IN REAL LIFE?
Now we are ALL expected to go out and ‘work’, is it a wonder we do not have time to do anything else let alone reach out to others? ( How ironic that even after the progress of feminism, what women have done for millennia is considered a waste, not work )
And if children are living in houses in which the family has no idea of connection or time or energy for it, how can they be expected to relate to anyone else in a genuinely intimate way?
I have often thought…we are scrambling to maintain houses, but who has a ‘home’ these days?
January 28, 2011 at 11:02 am
Rob
“It intrigues me no end, and actually quite thrills me, that some of the best conversations I have had with people in the past eight months have taken place at 6:00 in the morning as I sit in my study drinking my herbal tea and typing on my little Eee PC Notebook. I wonder if the day is coming when such an exercise might actually be considered a valid part of ministry
And it shall be called ‘E-Ministry’ but you will all need a web cam and ability to tie with many others which exists today
January 27, 2011 at 4:38 pm
Rob
Good summary Kim,
We had the same issues when we got married but in those days( OMG, I’ve reached that stage) the financial institutions would not consider including ones wifes incomes for a mortgage as she might get pregnant.
If your bank did grant your mortage it would not advance monies for items like a stove or fridge though a car required a 25 % down payment.
Mind you , once you had that mortgage they would give you all kinds of loans as you now had equity.
So, we got very creative in how we found and spent our monies.
Sunday shopping was not yet in place so families could still be together for the weekend mainly and our priority was to be at church and involved though as our kids got older we had the demand of Sunday sports practices et cetre.
In our case we were able to manage for some years on one income though it was attractive to have another but the ability and items in place to look after you children in the daytime were not in place as today nor the ability to consider dual incomes and earlier mprtgage payment choices.
Yes, places like Victoria , Vancouver, Toronto are very hard to have one income and fund a house and do it without working durla jobs at all times.
Peolple though are finding ways to lead a balanced life and manage payday to payday, not nice but mortgage rates are not in the double digit.
For the church , we have to be part of this society and make ourselves real to have people involved. It wikll be tough but if we listen , he will show us I pray.
Cheers
January 27, 2011 at 9:36 pm
Chris Eve
Christopher wrote
“Many of these realities cannot be changed by the church. But we must take seriously the world in which we operate.
We must learn to listen to the culture in which we are attempting to foster spiritual community. We must look honestly at our own life asking what things we need to let go of in order to support the spiritual flourishing of people in our day.”
I read your blog this morning and went for a walk this afternoon. I could not get your conclusion out of my mind.
We are in year seven of a painful, ennervating and apparently interminable exercise in our diocese. The societal realities described accurately in your post are not reflected in the actions of Diocesan Council or the recommendations of the review teams that are supposed to guide Council. Their techniques for promoting change are mainly exhortation and moral pressure linked with unattainable performance indicators of “success” (eg 3% more bums in pews every year while the number of potential believers in the society as a whole is in free fall). In these respects the plan has the same sense of unreality as the 5-year plans of Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union satirised in Orwell’s “Animal Farm”.
That our parish welcomes all, provides opportunities for a broad variety of worship, for prayer, fellowship and the study of scripture is why I keep coming back. They help me support the spiritual flourishing of others. It is not clear that giving any of them up would serve any purpose.
January 27, 2011 at 10:12 pm
jaqueline
Churches are not alone..alas…
“It says people used their favourite pubs to “measure their own lives, and Britain’s condition. They see reflected there, as in a glass, the present blights of social isolation, forgetfulness of history, cultural confusion; but they also see the forces of change somehow made to pause. Time slows; company gathers; speech is freed; beer flows, like the very lifeblood of the land. Pubs are needed, even when every social and economic indicator is running hard against them”.
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/pricewatch/2011/0110/1224287154652.html?via=mr
January 27, 2011 at 10:13 pm
jaqueline
the article is called: ” Who will mourn the loss of our pubs?”
January 27, 2011 at 11:31 pm
Chris Eve
Well, me. I can no longer consume the ale, but the town where I was born, Gravesend, had the highest crime rate in Kent and more pubs per square mile than the East End of London. It had apparently been like that since Charles Dickens’s day. The pub provided a social centre. Our local chess club met in a pub – we were the only team in the North Kent league to be so blessed. Our reputation for hospitality was legendary and we did not lose a home match for five years. Our chess players also managed a passable game of darts.
In the 60’s licensing laws were relaxed to allow families and children to go to pubs, as this was known to moderate consumption.
Alcohol is now sold in British supermarkets as a loss-leader. The local pub is undercut and driven out of business. Drinking alone at home is an alarming trend in the UK – resulting in sharply increased rates of serious liver diseases and obesity.
I was raised in the 50’s which were relatively prosperous – in 1959 the Macmillan Tories won re-election on the slogan “You’ve never had it so good.” In harsher times, the pub’s influence could be pernicious. Men would drink their paypacket to forget, causing hardship to wife and children. The Liverpool archives has an interesting collection of parish magazines 1890-1930’s – many of which were almost completely concerned with the temperance movement.
January 28, 2011 at 10:00 am
inaspaciousplace
To Bruce Bryant-Scott from above –
I am sure 7:00 a.m. coffee drinking blog reading counts as work, especially when the blog is as relevant and timely as the ones with which you are evidently occupying your morning meditations.
January 28, 2011 at 10:10 am
jaqueline
Christopher, if you click ‘reply’ on the bottom left of your last post above Bruce’s ( top left of Bruce’s post,) it will appear in context ( though after the one I just posted )
January 28, 2011 at 11:09 am
Rob
The pub is now replaced with Starbucks and other coffee shops for small gatherings otherwise it is the mall court. Problem is coffee shops are not kartge enough as half the sudents with their e-netbooks ate there between classes.
I do admit to hanging out with my ITouch…
We always insisted that we sit down for an evening meal and now we try to have supper one night to have a meal with our busy children and their familes.
Theyy get a supper out and we get to see them
Regardless of the times, families can work around anything if they want to
January 28, 2011 at 11:56 am
John
You outline the challenges beautifully. Point 14 is perhaps the greatest of them all. Given the shift in consciousness of both individuals and society accelerated by the onslaught of technology, we need to be nimble. There is a great place for church, we just have a ton of lost ground to make up. There is a need, ‘we’ are just not filling it. The old conceptions of institutional religion mixed with media onslaught of radical fundamentalism on both sides of the spectrum have clouded reality. We are on the right path, we are a place of welcome and transformation.