In the beginning was the Word,
and the Word was with God
and the Word was God.
He was in the beginning with God.
(John 1:1,2a)
You know you are in trouble before you get beyond the first verse of the first chapter in John’s Gospel.
John says that this “Word” that was “In the beginning” was “with God.” But then he goes on immediately in the next sentence to say that this “Word” that “was with God,” also “was God.”
We are forced at the beginning of John’s Gospel to deal with one of the central paradoxes of life and certainly of Christian faith. We experience life as both differentiation and as unity.
We know that we experience ourselves as separate. I see you and I know you are not me. I see the creation all around me and I know that I am distinct from the rest of the material forms that I perceive with my senses.
Yet, at the same time, when I can stop and open myself fully to a more subtle awareness of the realities of life, I know that there is something that connects you and me. I know that there is a life force, an energy, a vitality that surges through all life forms.
I sense that the “logos” that brought me into existence, is also responsible for your creation and for the creation of the flowers that bloom every spring. The more aware I become of the generative, sustaining intelligent energy that resides at the core of the universe, the more I sense that I share that energy with all creation.
So, I am both separate; and yet I am one with all life forms. We dissolve either end of this conundrum at our peril.
When I lose sight of the differentiation that is a central part of my experience of life, I risk devaluing the body and losing sight of the extraordinary beauty and value of creation. The “logos” through whom all things come “into being,” is manifest in a myriad of forms. God created difference in order that we might come to learn the extraordinary richness and value of all life forms.
The tension of difference is essential to our growth and maturity as human beings. As I struggle to live in harmony with the multiplicity of life forms all around me, I learn to let go of my determination that life should operate only as I decide. I begin to discover the value of surrender and of holding my heart open to difference.
But, if I focus all my energy on the diversity of life, I will lose touch with the essential unity of life in which diversity finds its fulfillment.
John could not be more clear. Everything that exists has a common source.
All things came into being through him,
and without him not one thing came into being.
(John 1:3)
For all the diversity of form in which life is manifest, we are one.
Jesus is the icon of separation and unity. In his human form he was both one with God and at the same time was distinct from God. I know this tension in my own life and seek to live in my separate identity in the deep awareness of the true nature of my unity with God.
8 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 23, 2011 at 6:40 am
jaqueline
love this…
“generative, sustaining INTELLIGENT energy”
Don’t get me wrong, I think intelligence might well be a description of life, but it has been bandied about so much by those that would dismiss the idea of evolution . Might we be be projecting our own idea of intelligence out into the world? Some one ( an atheist ) mentioned that human intelligence is the flowering of the processes of life…but to him I would suggest an counter sort of arrogance and projection in assuming that we are the only ones who could be described as intelligent.
November 23, 2011 at 6:42 am
jaqueline
love this post btw.: getting to the heart of the reason for the apparent contradiction.
November 23, 2011 at 11:12 am
Christopher Page
I agree that the word “intelligent” in this context is problematic. But I wanted to get away from any idea that the “energy” I understand as “logos” is in any way a kind of mindless, impersonal, purposeless force similar to electricity. As a Christian it seems to me I am committed to some concept of the power that holds the universe together being in some mysterious way both personal and purposeful. I can’t think of any better word than “intelligent” to express this. Any suggestions?
November 25, 2011 at 12:15 am
jaqueline
What a perfect qualification. …could it be slipped into your post…it is perfect as it is, no new word necessary.
it is a shame that word intelligence has been diffused in the ridiculous creationism vs evolution debate because it does convey what you want it to.
Perhaps we just have to bite the bullet and say personal and intelligent -after all in this case, the the gospel, logos is directly identified as an intelligent person.
November 23, 2011 at 8:13 am
lindsay
Hit-and-run
A glimpse,
Except for the dying raccoon,
You witness alone,
As death slams through this beast,
A grotesque belly dance puppet
Writhing, Devil trickster, with fangs and claws wild!
Surely a dangerous, crazy-eyed pain!
Scavenger, not someone’s pet or beloved!
No-one to mourn this one, single life form.
So you are drawn to hover behind hedge, then wall,
And an even stronger urge to get home.
So you creep, peeling back the road slowly,
Peer round the edge at the street, drama quieter now.
Push yourself to stand at the side of the road,
This breathe, this spasm – a few shallow tugs
These shoulders dry heave
This liquification of these eyes …
You resist the urge to sob openly,
Is this how compassion feels?
So you stand not knowing quite what to do,
So you wait with the bandit,
an unwelcome intrusion,
Honour Thy spirit … This Mother, This Father
So you stand waiting until spirit-rising passes,
Wrapping both within silent promise,
And so this moment is formed, an unsuspecting bond
You with your Spirit Guide.
November 23, 2011 at 11:13 am
Christopher Page
this is glorious Lindsay! Thank you.
November 23, 2011 at 8:18 am
Tress
Thank you perfectly put.
November 25, 2011 at 1:50 am
Tweet Preachers » Two and One John 1:1-3 « In A Spacious Place
[…] Recommended Tweet Preachers Tweet FROM https://inaspaciousplace.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/two-and-one-john-11-3/ […]