Rob Crosby-Shearer on his blog “waiting for the believers,” has issued a stirring call to Christians to consider how we might respond to the reality that “there is trouble afoot” in the church.

Basing his thoughts on the work of Margaret Wheatley and Deborah Frieze, Rob outlines three responses to the challenges confronted by the church:

1. We could “bail on the organization/denomination/parish/ congregation/ community.” Rob sees the attraction in this option but offers a stern warning that there may be drawbacks to just walking away.

2. We could simply give in to “apathy,” stay in, keep the machinery turning over and find our spiritual nourishment elsewhere. This response Rob suggests is simply not an option we can entertain with credibility “if we are called to be passionate followers of Jesus Christ.”

So, is there a third way that might make it possible to stay within the church while resisting the danger of being overwhelmed by the tradition, and bureaucracy that can cause dynamic ministry to sink into stasis?

3. Rob holds out the possibility of staying connected to the established institutional expressions of Christian faith, while we “walk the edge” in pioneering ways that “build new systems which nurture deep community,” while continuing to “take care of each other and ourselves.” See Rob’s whole post at: http://waitingforthebelievers.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/walk-out-walk-on-and-the-death-of-the-church/

Numbers 1 and 2 are the cheap easy choices. They resolve the tension of dealing with the often difficult realities of community life by wandering in the spiritual ozone without deep commitment trying to create a spirituality that suits our individual tastes. But they also miss the richness that is available if we can hold together and work out new ways of being.

So how do we avoid #’s 1 & 2 and move to #3.

In Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, Thomas Merton famously promised that “the gate of heaven is everywhere.” But, as much as we may long to see “the gate of heaven,” we need always to keep Merton’s caution in mind when he admitted, “I have no program for this seeing.”

The deep renewal of the church is less about what we do than it is about how we do what we do. And we will only get the how of church right when everything we do is deeply rooted in Christ. There is no preset program that can guarantee to usher all communities through “the gate of heaven” into the promised land of relevant dynamic ministry in the context in which we find ourselves at this time.

The crisis of the church is more a crisis of culture than curriculum. If we are going to move forward it will only be as we develop an ethos that starts from a profound awareness of God’s presence and action at work in our lives, in the church, throughout the world, and in all of creation.

We need to develop hearts that perceive where the Spirit is moving in our experience and wills that long to cooperate with that work. There may be “no program for this seeing.” But there are practices we can adopt that have the capacity to make us more susceptible to perceive where the wind of the Spirit may be stirring.

Our hearts will open as we let go of our agendas, needs, desires, pre-determined ideas about what must be/ought to be/ should be, and spend time listening. The practices of an open heart begin with deep trust in Christ and proceed with gentleness, flexibility, silence, stillness, surrender, and courage.  We need to find inner stillness and open to the mysterious work of God all around.

The church will sing with the vibrancy of God’s Spirit, when our hearts sing with the awareness of the power of Love that sustains the universe. For this truly there is no program.